Organization Structure Essay

Tips Or you bear approach this way1. Briefly introduce the various organisational theories.2. Mention that you will concentrate analysing two theories, where examples of principle and practice do-nothing be found from the case study, for the purpose of this task. Analyse how organisational theory underpins principles and practice of organizing and management.a. Briefly introduce the various organizational theories (Scientific management, classical administration and etc)b. Analyse in details the various organizational theories in terms of its principles and practice.( Analysis 1.Explain what they are, 2.describe their characteristics and under what circumstances each of them may be useful and 3.evaluate theirstrengths and weaknesses)c. Relate these theories, where appropriate and applicable, to the case study.d. Draw a short conclusionTips Or you can approach this way1. Briefly introduce the various organizational theories.2. Mention that you will centre analysing two theories, where examples of principle and practice can be found from the case study, for the purpose of this task.1. Draw the organizational complex body parts for both firms You should be able to see the differences of the two organizational structures Tall and short hierarchical structure, abridge and wide span of management, specialization by geographic or functions or something else. These diagrams serve as the ground for you to do the following compare and contrast.2. Compare and contrast the differences of organizational structures between the firms Based on the in a higher place diagrams, do the compare and contrast. Compare and contrast means you need to find out* What are the things standardized between the two companies?* What are the differences between the two companies?Sample answer for 2a. Organizational structureGiven the diagram, it is clear that both companies have a formalorganizational structure. There are hitherto differences between the two companies.First, Boss Ltd is taller than Agar in organizational hierarchy. (Plagarism is a serious offence. This content can be found at http//btechnd.blogpot.com/) This is due to the structure necessarily to support Boss Ltds geographic and product divisions that accommodate 400 more staff than Agar Ltd(Plagarism is a serious offence. This content can be found at http//btechnd.blogpot.com) . In contrast, Agar has a layer reporting hierarchy. Its line of subordination is shorter than that of Boss Ltd.Second, the span of management, in the case of Boss Ltd, is narrower than that of Agar. That being the case, a stronger degree of decentralised determination making is practised in Boss. Agars decision making mainly centralized to the chief executive officer himself.